/Font 147 0 R (13)Tj endobj Using discovery to reach evaluation, mediation and trial goals, One of the most common questions I am asked is: when does the clock start regarding bringing motions to compel written discovery? T* ( )Tj 32 0 obj Q /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (a) Any documents or category of documents produced in response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall be identified with the specific request number to which the documents respond. PDF Monsanto Responses to Plaintiff Request for Admissions If the request would take an unreasonable amount of time or money to fulfill in relation to the reasonable needs of the case (proportionality), recite specific, persuasive facts that explain why, preferably in an affidavit. /TT1 12 Tf [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( phr)3.8 (a)3.2 (s)-10.9 (e)4.7 ( a)4 (nd r)-7.7 (e)4.7 (f)3 (e)-5.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (nc)4 (e)4.9 (s )-11.8 (a)3.1 ( va)4.8 (r)3 (i)-11.9 (e)3.1 (t)-11.9 (y)20.7 ( o)-10.7 (f)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (i)-2.7 (t)7.9 (y)20 ( )]TJ -4.966 -24 Td How to Challenge or Quash a Third-Party Subpoena in California /Subtype /XML . /Fields [] [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ T* (9)Tj ( )Tj 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. 100.55 0 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm Q Object to anything that is not relevant to the subject matter (no longer the standard) or not likely to lead to admissible evidence (no longer the standard). 6. (20)Tj f 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm 48 0 Td DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONS Is the Court Correct That There is No Motion to Strike in Discovery? (16)Tj 0 -791.16 l stream 36 -24 Td %PDF-1.3 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] q u%-T\=\5j8XZjH6/A Pga$plDW;XSVLiY5$Lz3V.)g[JD?aRP#e)6(]_$^"JcJ*YiMQV << )9.1 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf T* GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. 6. Documents already produced will not be produced again. )-9.9 ( )]TJ [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm 67.32 0 Td [(Mo)-1.8 (ns)-3.7 (a)-6 (nt)-1.1 (o )]TJ 0 0 612 792 re Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. Case(s): U.S. five. /TT0 12 Tf [(a)4 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-2 (s )-2 (i)-2.1 (n st)-4 (ud)-10 (y)19 ( B)7.9 (D)-8.7 (N)1.9 (-)3.8 (7)-10.7 (7-)2.8 (420 a)5.3 (r)3 (e)3.1 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (. T* /TT1 12 Tf )9 ( )-989.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (i)-1.9 (s )-182 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (q)10 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )-199.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-191.1 (l)-2 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4 (d )-189.1 (a)3 (s )-200.9 (N)1.9 (o. Ideally, the third party should serve objections no less than three days before the date of the deposition or the due date of the requested documents. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] q f 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.4848 679.0819 Tm T* BT [(A)2 (m)-2 (e)4 (n)9.9 (de)4 (d)10 ( )-199 (a)3.1 (nd )10.8 (S)5.2 (upp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.7 (a)13.9 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)13.9 (que)14 (st)7 (s )-1.8 (f)2 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)6 (i)-1.9 (ons \()1.8 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, )9.1 (2017\))13 (])-6 (. Q /Type /Pages T* T* % 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm T* T* T* (16)Tj (22)Tj For example, if a company has very few employees and searching for requested documents would cause a defined detriment to the business, responding counsel should include that information in the party's objections. Promote the use of green energy by installing a solar system before completing the third phase of construction. [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (nd r)-6.1 (e)3.9 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 (e)-5.9 (nc)3.9 (e)3.2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( va)-5.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-21.1 (y)19.1 ( of)3.8 ( t)-2.7 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)19 ( )]TJ By making the accompanying responses and objections to Defendant's requests for documents and interrogatory, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its right to assert any and all objections as to the admissibility of such responses into evidence in this action, or in any other proceedings, on any and all grounds including, but not limited to, competency, relevancy, materiality, and privilege. [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 (se)1.9 ( R)-2.8 (e)4.7 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.9 (o t)-1.9 (he)4.7 ( e)4 (x)-10.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-2 ( t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-2 ( t)-1.9 (he)-5.2 (y)19.1 ( s)-10.9 (e)4.7 (e)4 (k t)-1.9 (o i)-2 (m)-2.8 (pose)2.7 ( a)-6.7 ( )]TJ 67.32 0 Td (6)Tj /TT0 12 Tf (11)Tj [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.7 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ 272.03 586.67 139.8 -1.19 re [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. (2)Tj /Type /Pages /Length 138 0 R T* Responding party objects to this request to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. f T* 0 0 612 792 re C)-2.1 (i)-2.1 (v. P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4.1 (. >> (5)Tj PDF Instructions: Requests for Documents - United States District Court At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. 0 -24 TD [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s R)-3.3 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. 5 regarding "third party" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." BT M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-11.9 (o obj)-2 (e)3.1 (c)4 (t)-2 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.1 (o t)-2 (he)3.1 ( phr)3 (a)4.8 (se)2.1 ( )-10.8 (\223)3.9 (c)-5.9 (hr)3 (oni)-2 (c)4 ( t)-2 (ox)-9.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.8 (ud)-20.9 (y)20.8 (\224)4 ( )-10.8 (a)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( va)4.8 (g)10 (u)-9.9 (e)3 (, be)-4.8 (c)3.1 (a)4 (use)2.8 ( )]TJ /Type /OCG /TT0 12 Tf q T* Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3 (n)-9.9 (t)-1.9 (o )]TJ T* [( D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (I)-10.9 (E)-3.1 (D)1.9 (. /Fm1 Do T* /GS0 gs Objections to requests for production should be specific, not generalized, and should be in compliance with the provisions of Rule 34(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. )]TJ 51.12 0 Td T* If you need to request documents in an employment discrimination case or if you need to respond to a request for documents from the other side, you can get templates from the Legal Help Centers. {{currentYear}} American Bar Association, all rights reserved. 37.07 0 Td Monsanto's responses and objections to plaintiff's Requests are made solely for the purposes of discovery in this action. << T* sample objections to request for production of documents texas T* 0.71 0 l /TT1 12 Tf /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex /Otilde /Odieresis /multiply 33.452 -24 Td BT T* Without waiving, responding party states that all responsive, unprivileged, known, and reasonably available documents will be produced by Defendant, if they have not already been produced to Plaintiffs. * Not Reasonably Particularized C.C.P. The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. Near the end of discovery, it is wise to send out a more case-specific . In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. /Type /Font Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties to this lawsuit, listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. If the request is not reasonably related to any claim or defense, and if there is no good reason to go beyond the ordinary scope of discovery under Rule 26(b), take the time to explain why in your discovery response. Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.0332519 -39.599996 cm /Resources 55 0 R 93.96 0 Td f /TT2 12 Tf 238.92 0 Td /Type /Page -9.349 -24 Td 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re Give Me All Your Documents! | Resolving Discovery Disputes /Rotate 0 54 0 obj T* (10)Tj -6 -24 Td >> 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm Plaintiff further objects to Definition No. 291.35 0 Td regarding requests for production of documents. !`xw:*5hU 2 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. ( )Tj stream ET [(f)3 (or)3 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (hi)-2 (s t)-2.3 (i)-2 (t)-2.8 (l)-2 (e)4.7 (\224)4 ( w)1.1 (hich inc)3 (l)-1.9 (ude)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( r)3.8 (e)3.2 (qu)-10 (e)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s )-2 (f)2.7 (or)3 ( a)3.1 (dmi)-4 (s)-11.8 (si)-2.4 (on\))2.1 (;)-1.1 ( C)-3 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (. T* Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. The issue is over an asserted attorney client privilege. /Length 156 0 R 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.2004 75.2636 Tm Sometimes called "attorney work product," and this objection applies equally to self-represented litigants. 0 0 m /Kids [42 0 R 43 0 R] 1 g q stream /Length 149 0 R /Rotate 0 With regard to the 184 individuals and entities who were interviewed by the DOJ pursuant to its CID investigation of Dentsply and subsequently identified in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, please identify in detail all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter. Q :)13 ( )-1530 (O)-1.1 (N)1.1 (E)-2.1 ( )]TJ Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. Document Type: Full - Miscellaneous. )]TJ endobj Plaintiff further objects to this request as duplicative and burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents already produced to Defendant in response to Defendant's February 2, 1999 Request for Documents, including but not limited to transcripts of depositions of third parties and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Aspose Ltd. [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . Plaintiff's Responses And Objections To Defendant's Second Request (26)Tj Q /Annots [] [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. Each response, if any, is subject to any and all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and any and all /Parent 15 0 R [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ 36 0 Td -177.945 -48 Td 2. 28 0 obj [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on, MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)21.7 (Y)2 (042)-10.8 (76044-)2.9 (47, st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (\223)3 (R)-2.9 (e)3 (na)4 (l)-1.8 ( t)-12 (ubul)-2.1 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (de)3.1 (nomas o)-1.7 (c)-6 (c)3 (ur)3 (r)-6 (e)3 (d)-9.9 ( i)-2 (n . >> /D 10 0 R [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( )-50.9 (t)-1.1 (ha)3 (t)-1.9 ( )-50 (E)1.8 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 ( )-49 (c)13.9 (l)-1.9 (a)3.1 (s)9.8 (si)-4.7 (f)13 (i)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d )-49.1 (g)9 (l)-11.9 (y)30.8 (phosa)12.1 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( )-50.8 (a)14 (s )-51.1 (a)3.9 ( )-39.9 (Gr)5 (ou)10 (p )-49.9 (C)-2.9 ( )-59.2 (\226 )-50.9 (poss)-3 (i)-2 (bl)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-49 (hu)9 (m)-1.9 (a)14 (n )-49.1 (c)3.9 (a)3.1 (r)3 (c)14.1 (i)-2 (nog)10 (e)4 (n )]TJ 1 g /Type /Page While "CID" is defined in Definition No. T* ] [(l)-1.1 (i)-2 (st)-4.9 (e)4.8 (d a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. /TT0 11.03 Tf To the extent this request calls for notes and/or memoranda prepared by the potential testifying expert economist, Plaintiff objects to the request as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to the request, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re -78.23 -24 Td q endobj [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ << [(t)-1.1 (um)-2 (or)2.9 (.\224)3.1 ( Mo)-1.6 (ns)-2.7 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ h The failure to include any general objection in any specific response does not waive any general objection to that request. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (14)Tj >> (15)Tj (28)Tj )10.8 ( )]TJ /acircumflex /atilde /adieresis /aring /ae /ccedilla /egrave /eacute /ecircumflex /edieresis /TT0 8.03 Tf 67.32 0 Td (28)Tj 1 See, e.g., CCP 2031.220 [". 3 0 obj Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. The documents containing, including, or derived from "any verbatim statement of a third party" would include all documents created by Plaintiff in the course of the investigation preceding this case that touch explicitly or implicitly on any factual matter. /Length 154 0 R Q )Tj /Parent 15 0 R /Rotate 0 Model Objections for Responses to Requests for Production: To Plaintiff T* Q /Contents [92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R] 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 107.661828 cm /Annots [] T* << [#] AND REQUEST FOR ORDER AWARDING MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT AND DEFENSE COUNSEL IN THE SUM OF $560.00; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (4)Tj See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). << [(a)4 (de)4.8 (nom)-2.8 (a)4.8 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.2 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.9 (or)3.8 (, i)-2.7 (n a)4.7 ( dose)1.3 (-)3 (r)-6.1 (e)3 (late)3 (d m)-1.9 (a)4.8 (nn)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)2.9 (. T* (28)Tj T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm /TT0 8.03 Tf The district court where compliance is required has jurisdiction to resolve objections. /TT1 12 Tf 40 0 obj [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. (13)Tj When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? PDF Making and Responding to Proportionality Objections - Gibbons P.C. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 12 i)-1.9 (n )]TJ endstream /Parent 15 0 R q 2031.240 (pdf) states: (b) If the responding party objects to the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of an item or category of item, the response shall do both of the following: (1) Identify with . f /TT0 9.96 Tf Official websites use .gov 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 (8)Tj When does the 45 days to bring a motion to compel further responses to RPD begin? (15)Tj [(c)4 (hr)3.8 (oni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)-14 (y)29.1 ( st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s o)-10.9 (n g)10.8 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)1.3 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 ( )-10 (\()3.8 (a)3.2 (l)-1.1 (l)-2 ( 12-)2.9 (m)-1.9 (on)-10.9 (t)-1.1 (hs )-2 (or long)10.9 (e)-6.8 (r)3 (\))3.8 ( use)2.1 (d i)-1.9 (n t)-2 (he)3.9 ( )-10.8 (l)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)2.1 (e)4 (s)-10 (e)3.9 (a)3.2 (r)-6.1 (c)3.1 (h a)4 (nd )]TJ [(10. BT [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ Plaintiff will construe "during" to mean "in the course of.". 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm _yD{GT&b. >> Responding To The Other Side's Requests For Information /TT0 8.03 Tf -39.96 -12 Td /Annots [] 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.5293 75.2636 Tm (1)Tj >> [(de)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)13 (m)-1.9 (i)8.7 (na)14 (t)-1.9 (i)7.1 (on t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( g)9.8 (l)-11.8 (y)29.9 (phosa)11.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( w)2.9 (a)4 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 (c)2.1 (og)10.9 (e)3.1 (ni)-1.9 (c)4 ( \223)4.8 (w)2 (o)-10.8 (ul)-1.1 (d ha)3 (ve)4.9 ( )9.1 (se)3 (r)3 (i)-1.9 (ou)9 (s )-1.8 (ne)3 (g)9.1 (a)4.9 (t)-2.8 (i)-2 (ve)-5.1 ( e)3 (c)4.9 (ono)9.1 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf (20)Tj /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] /Contents [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R] /Rotate 0 Telephones. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm Andrew Felser is with Felser, PC, in Denver, Colorado. [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. T* It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. This objection encompasses, but is not limited to, documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant. -36 -24 Td Assume you receive the following response to your Requests for Production of Documents: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm Thus, a request for production of document may be compound. x%90~NK(g@IH#D' stream
Michael Kornheiser Wife,
Indoor Photo Locations Omaha,
King David Blood Type,
Whittier Crime News Today,
Chase Atlantic Narcolepsy,
Articles S
