The major effects would have been on the US. on politics, society, foreign policy, philosophy and tech. WebBy the time the allies were pushing through Europe, the US had collected many victories in the pacific, the arena of carriers and planes. Their aircraft carriers are mostly converted from civilian ships during interwar years. The exhausted Allies would have had to negotiate some kind of settlement with Central Power forces occupying almost all of what is now Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltic republics in the east; most of Romania and Yugoslavia in Southern Europe, as well as a bit of Italy; and almost all of Belgium and most of northeast, 5 Reasons the United States Entered World War One. But when examined by looking past all these ideological and social biases and historical baggage, one faces a rather unconventional conclusion: A quick look at the strategic setup, relative war production and technology level of countries seems to suggest that Ww2 could have been won without United States. Ukraine war latest: Boy, 6, cries as sister killed in Russian attack The reason why Churchill was doing this, is because he wanted USSR to be destroyed by Germany, or at least let them bleed each other out, as the common advocacy was in early years of war among British and US industrialists or Anglo-centrists. Britain, and probably France as well, would have likely pressured the Poles to accept such a reasonable compromise proposal and informed them they would not support Poland militarily if Poland rejected it just as they told Czech leaders after Munich. As history tells us, Operation Overlord was a success as Allied forces managed to breach Hitlers Red Army tank officers were not impressed with the 2-pounder (40mm) gun on the Matilda and Valentines, nor their poor cross-country mobility, but their 6075mm-thick armour was impervious to German 3.7cm and 5cm anti-tank weapons. Theres rather broad agreement among mainstream historians on this. Again I asked myself the question would the Allied powers had won without US involvement, and it is harder for me to say than the previous thread. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. However the steam roller would still have been there and would still have rolled over Berlin though possibly 3-6 months later (don't over estimate the effect of moterised transport in russia, both the red army and the wermacht advanced troops on foot and used horse drawn transport in large quantities as it was, the Russians would have coped) Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. Today to win a war even against a regional power there is a process that often involves "coalition" building. Eventually, those nations got out of the fight and in the case of Romania joined with the Soviets against the Hungarians. But we have much to learn from that achievement as we face our troubles today. Germany invaded France with more horses than Napoleon had used in 1812! This article examines the claim made by Soviet historiography, and it comes to the conclusion that both Western supplies and military intervention were far more helpful than claimed by the Soviets. In contrast, people in Eastern Front were ordered to die where they stood. However it doesnt seem to be critical to the wars result. The Lend-Lease act was enacted in March 1941 and authorized the United States to provide weapons, provisions, and raw materials to strategically important countries fighting Germany and Japan -- primarily, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China. What would have happened if the United States didnt enter WWII? Yet, here again is a case of the wrong equipment. U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs the Lend-Lease Act on March 11, 1941. During the Spanish Civil War, which has been called a dress rehearsal for the Second World War, Germany's Luftwaffe perfected its strategy of using dive bombers and close-support attack aircraft. What do you think would have happened if the US had not entered the war on the side of the Allies? Malyshev took charge of an industry that was in chaos, moving the Leningrad and Kharkov tank plants to the Urals. The plane spent 69 years on the tundra before a Russian Geographical Society expedition rescued it in 2016 and returned the wreckage to Krasnoyarsk. After the war, it was transferred to civilian aviation, carrying passengers over the frozen tundra above the Arctic Circle. Allies Won World War II Such assessments, however, are contradicted by the opinions of Soviet war participants. Churchill would have been ousted by a pragmatist, perhaps RAB Butler or Sir John Simon who would have sought peace with Hitler in exchange for some degree of self determination, which would in effect have counted for little. He could have requested the return of all of Germanys lost eastern territories from Poland. Yes Lend-Lease was vital, In order to ensure that tank production goals were met by Soviet industry, Stalin made Vyacheslav Malyshev, an engineer who had proven himself in the expansion of Soviet heavy industry in the 1930s, head of the Peoples Commissariat of the Tank Industry of the USSR (NKTP) that was established on 11 September. Would the Allies have won WWII if the USA had never entered 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance No doubt the historical conditions of America's economic surge during World War II were singular. "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. Normandy and the Bocage around it could be considered bloody battles, with Allies moving inch by inch. Japan was far too behind in war production, technology in respect to other combatants. Thousands of kilometers of advance, for nothing, practically. Churchills delaying tactics took the form of pressing for a continued push to divert troops to capture the Dodecanese islands in the Mediterranean and mount diversionary battles in Italy. Does Nike Training Club Have Weight Training? Peace with Nazi Germany would have opened the door to a major Anglo-French military intervention in the Russo-Finnish War consisting of 150,000-300,000 troops, which might have enabled the Finns to hold out until spring 1941 when Operation Barbarossa beganif not retake lost territory. It is no exaggeration to say that America won the war abroad and the peace at home at the same time. The British didn't have enough troops? A major question, a major discussion topic. Overall, the Western Allies were responsible only for a small fraction of the losses sustained by German infantry and armor between 1941 and 1943 (around 10 percent); however, their contribution in the destruction and occupation of the Luftwaffe was overwhelming. Spam saved the Soviet Union? The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55 percent of all the aluminum the Soviet Union used during the war and more than 80 percent of the copper. If Zhukov was able to destroy a veteran Japanese army in ~4 months in Khalkin Gol, they could easily hold them off with less divisions and resources. Allies have won The Terror? It is hard to overestimate the negative impact Hitlers foolhardy violation of the Munich Pact had upon Chamberlain. Finland was only in the war to fight the Soviet Union, while the same was largely true of Romania and Hungary. On: July 7, 2022. Allied advance in the West definitely took some heat off of Eastern Front, but as can be understood from the situation by the time of landings, Germans did not fear Western Front as they regarded Eastern Front. Such machines were of higher quality than analogues produced in the Soviet Union, which made a significant contribution to boosting Soviet industrial production. The Moscow Victory Parade on June 24, 1945, involved some 40,000 Red Army soldiers and nearly 1,900 military vehicles. Even with everything noted above, Germany and its European partners could have still won the war were it not for Germany's declaration of war on the United States on December 11, 1941. But without the Allies in his back, Hitler would have sent all his The additional firepower, resources, and soldiers of the U.S. helped to tip the balance of the war in favor of the Allies. Sorry Soviet and British Nationalists: the USA economic, industrial and operational/tactical contributions were key: You know, that's the crux of the problem in all these discussions: practically. It was quite well equipped with 9,248 tanks, 6,584 artillery pieces and. By June 1944, Soviets were already positioning for their drive into Germany, as can be seen from the state of Eastern Front at that date: Just a month after Normandy, Red Army was already pushing into Germany. Would the Allies have won WWII without the USA? | History Forum Adolf Hitler joined a list of would-be invaders of the British Isles but clearly didn't remember that no one successfully invaded since 1066 when William the Conqueror defeated Harold II, the last crowned Anglo-Saxon king of England. 3 US as the major part of landings in Northern Africa, Italy and Europeis an important bit. Especially considering that the route from NW China/Korea to Soviet heartland passes through never ending Central Asian steppes. [Total: 0 Average: 0] Without the backing of American weaponry, munitions and loans, the Allies would have been forced to abandon their goal of the knockout blow. WebWould Russia have won ww2 without the US? By the time lead-lease had produced any major change in the situation the decision to invade Russia and thus lose the war had already been taken in Berlin. Though Germans would rightfully conclude that at that point a British invasion would not have much impact, therefore reduce their divisions in the West quite a lot. Rather, the consequence of lend-lease was to virtually bankrupt this country and lead to the collapse in our manufacturing base, whilst the Marshall Plan created one of the strongest economies in the world - who got the short straw? I already posted a similar thread about US involvement in WWI. So in World War One, I think fresh American troops helped change the outcome. Germany had to deal with resistance and partisan efforts, and as the tide of war turned its "allies" left the fight. Accept British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlains offer of a second Four-Power Conference. "In a hypothetical battle one-on-one between the U.S.S.R and Germany, without the help of Lend-Lease and without the diversion of significant forces of the Luftwaffe and the German Navy and the diversion of more than one-quarter of its land forces in the fight against Britain and the United States, Stalin could hardly have beaten Hitler," Sokolov wrote in an essay for RFE/RL's Russian Service. After that point it was about who would end up with how much of Europe at the end of the war. Many of the arguments are colored either by existing national or social biases, and many of them are colored by propaganda be it World War II propaganda, be it Cold War propaganda. By It was the job of the ordinary German to perish in Eastern Front where he stood. Its merely that their Prime Minister is balking, Stimson wrote in his diary. I already posted a similar thread about US involvement in WWI. This proved crucial in the Blitzkrieg against the Low Countries and France. In 1941-2 we started to lose shipping to U boats faster than we could build them so we would eventually have brought to starvation without the US Liberty ships. It had Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria on its side. However, even with lack of US presence in the war, Germany would still need to keep some presence in this Atlantic Wall of theirs. The United States later declared war on German ally Austria-Hungary on December 7, 1917. The war would have had a very different outcome, which could have led to a completely different world today. WebAmerica's noteable allies in World War II were the USSR, Great Britain (and all her commonwealths, including New Zealand, Canada, Australia, etc. Various French Kings conducted some raids, the Spanish planned to use its Armada, the Dutch managed to at least burn some English warships in the Thames but even Napoleon never dared mount what would have been a futile invasion. He is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com. How many U.S. troops lost their lives in ww1? Without US, Britain would still be able to prevent Germany from taking off to the seas. It is also possibleand perhaps even likelythat without the promise of Allied military support, Poland would have agreed to cede the rest of West Prussia and perhaps even East Upper Silesia, but not Posen, to Nazi Germany in order to avoid war. From the late spring to early fall of 1945 Europe saw several large "Victory Parades" that celebrated the defeat of Nazi Germany and the end of the Second World War. This prompted Germany to declare war on the United States, which, in turn, led to the United States to declare war on Germany on December 11, 1941. BBC - History - World Wars: World War Two: How the Allies Won There may have been mass starvation in the UK. "Without Lend-Lease, the Red Army would not have had about one-third of its ammunition, half of its aircraft, or half of its tanks. Although Allied aid was used directly to supply the armed forces with both durable goods and consumables, indirectly it probably released resources to households. Relatives and friends have buried children and others killed in a Russian missile attack on the central Ukrainian city of Uman. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. British Matilda tanks are loaded onto a ship for transportation to the U.S.S.R. as part of the Lend-Lease program. The First World War saw two factions of "great powers" square off. Japan had attacked the United States, so Germany was never required to join with its Axis partner. have Could we really have set up the production of our tanks without American steel? The United States is a country of machines. Across Northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and into Northern Germany, 21st Army Group advanced on a front about 75 miles wide. Of course, the easiest way Germany could have won World War II was by avoiding a fight with Britain, France, and the United States of America. There would have been effects life in britain and russia would have been less plesent and food less plentiful. But when World War II has considered it is really Germany and Japan against most of the world. But it would Japan would have to cross thousands of kilometers of central Asian steppes in which they would be having to face Soviet armored brigades, who would be at home in these unimpeded plain steppes these were what Soviet tanks were designed for anyway. After this proposal was rejected by the Poles, he could have demanded the return of merely Danzig and the Polish Corridor perhaps with some of the same assurances to the Poles offered by the German delegation at Versailles in 1919, namely to allow the Poles a road/rail corridor to the German port of Danzig just as he offered Poland in real life. Would the Allies have won WWII if the USA had never entered the war? They were rapidly obsoleted and were relegated to back line duties (reserve, regional back line defense, training) towards 1943 due to speed of technological advancement on both sides. 117,000The armies of the Central Powers mobilised 25 million soldiers and 3.5 million of them died.World War 1 casualties. While the United States quickly transitioned to a wartime economy that had companies like IBM making rifles instead of typewriters and GM making tanks instead of cars; Germany was producing consumer goods all the way until 1942 when Albert Speer took over as Minister of Armaments. World War II With farm labour cut to the bone, to permit the maximum concentration of manpower on the Red Army and on armaments production, only those who worked received adequate rations. We cannot measure the distance of the Soviet economy from the point of collapse in 1942, but it seems beyond doubt that collapse was near. 21st Army Group could advance from Venice/Trieste to Vienna and Prague, but there's no one on their flanks. Churchill is particularly a factor in this. WebWithout the Russian Front, Germany would have turned the beaches of Europe into an impenetrable fortress. In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. Germany built no heavy bombers and lacked any truly effective long range aircraft. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. without the US sending in Millions of troops and supplying material I dont see an Entente victory. The 76-year-old's private plane is expected to land at Aberdeen WebIf the US continued to send supplies to the Allies, then the Allies probably win, nothing else appearing. Rommel had scarce manpower and supplies at his disposal, yet he made good use of what he had, and Britain succeeded in stopping Germans only with amassing of massive resources and manpower in firstFirst Battle of El Alamein. At the end of the war, the disparage was far greater Soviets ran over all the elite crack troops Japanese crammed into Manchuria and trusted quite a lot, and they ran over them in justonemonth. There is no plausible reason to believe that Romania wouldn't change sides once Red Army was at its borders. Inevitably so, since British were still in the war, and even though British and Canadians were frustrated in a grand fashion when they attempted a landing inDieppe Raidto test German defenses in regard to a possible landing, the risk of a potential landing was still there. But for the sake of a full spectrum analysis, lets assume that Lend Lease was tied to US joining the war, and if US did not join, there would be no Lend Lease. Would an America isolationist enough to deny the UK Lend-Lease have been isolationist enough to grant Hitler the monies that he used to build his Army and Navy. The Lusitania. This gave Poland the footing it needed to refuse all of Hitlers subsequent attempts to negotiate the return of this Polish occupied German city. The thing that is certain that war would last even longer in that case, and cost many more lives. Would the Allies have won WW2 without In other words, Lend-Lease was stabilizing. From the depths of the Cold War to the present day, many Soviet and Russian politicians have ignored or downplayed the impact of American assistance to the Soviets, as well as the impact of the entire U.S.-British war against the Nazis. The Lend-Lease program also provided more than 35,000 radio sets and 32,000 motorcycles. Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. War of 1812. That neatly sums it up. By this time US aid was already flowing in, and the victory came afterSecond Battle of El Alamein, after US themselves joined. In addition, the Lend-Lease program propped up the Soviet railway system, which played a fundamental role in moving and supplying troops. This caused him to do an about-face and guarantee Poland against potential German military aggression, which Hitler had never even contemplated up to that point. The Germans were fantastically luck between 1939 and 42, which by the way is when Lend-Lease to the Soviets actually kicked in, and their defeat earlier is entirely plausible. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. Nevertheless, British Lend-Lease tanks helped the Red Army to restock its tank units until domestic production could catch up and are estimated to have comprised about 10 per cent of the tanks defending Moscow in NovemberDecember 1941. Had Germany been on an actual wartime economy from 1939 things could have been vastly different. He rapidly began to simplify construction procedures for the T-34 and within less than a year the number of man-hours required to produce T-34s was cut in half. It was a great symbol of prestige for the resurgent Kriegsmarine, but the money and material could have been utilized in a larger U-Boat force. Many contributed to relief efforts; others volunteered as ambulance drivers or nurses, or even as pilots and soldiers. The lack of lend-lease would have made life very difficult, and it would have taken much longer to assemble any kind of invasion force - possibly allowing Germany to develop atomic weapons and extended range missiles. Would the allies still have won World War 2 without an US
